The expression “public servant” in the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 is deliberately wider than the conventional idea of a permanent government employee. The Act covers persons by reference to the office held, the institution served, the source or charact…
Since 26 July 2018, Section 8 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 directly criminalises specified conduct by the bribe giver. The provision is not limited to a comp…
Section 9 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 creates a distinct offence for commercial organisations. It addresses a familiar enforcement problem: a bribe may be d…
An allegation that a public servant possesses assets disproportionate to known lawful income is not established merely by identifying unexplained wealth. The prosecution …
The Delhi High Court has clarified when prior sanction is required to prosecute former public servants under section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 after th…
Many PC Act offences appear in the PMLA Schedule. A corruption allegation can therefore generate a parallel money-laundering investigation, but the two offences remain di…
Modern corruption investigations rely on call recordings, messaging applications, CCTV, spreadsheets, location data and digital payment trails. Their persuasive force dep…
The 2018 amendment inserted a clear expedition framework. A Special Judge should, as far as practicable, hold the trial daily and endeavour to conclude it within two year…
PC Act offences are tried by Special Judges appointed under Section 3. Section 4 also permits trial of connected conspiracies, attempts, abetments and other offences that…
Section 21 permits a person charged with a PC Act offence to testify for the defence. The accused becomes a competent witness only on a written request; the prosecution c…
The amended Section 20 permits a statutory presumption in a trial under Section 7 or Section 11 when it is proved that the public servant accepted, obtained or attempted …
Not every error in sanction automatically nullifies a corruption trial. Section 19 requires courts reviewing an error, omission or irregularity to ask whether it has occa…
The 2018 amendment expressly addresses a request for sanction made by a person other than a police officer or investigating agency. It creates screening conditions intend…
The 2018 amendment expanded Section 19 so previous sanction is required for specified offences alleged against a person who is employed or, at the time of the alleged off…
The 2018 amendment inserted Chapter IVA and Section 18A, applying the Criminal Law Amendment Ordinance, 1944, as far as may be, to attachment, administration and confisca…
Section 18 gives a competent investigating officer access to bankers’ books where there is reason to suspect a PC Act offence and inspection is necessary for investigatio…
The first proviso to Section 17A states that previous approval is unnecessary for cases involving arrest of a person on the spot on the charge of accepting or attempting …
Section 17A requires previous approval before enquiry, inquiry or investigation where the alleged PC Act offence is relatable to a recommendation made or decision taken b…
Section 17 restricts investigation of PC Act offences to police officers of specified rank unless a competent Magistrate orders otherwise. The safeguard seeks experienced…
Section 15 punishes an attempt to commit the offence referred to in Section 13(1)(a), the misappropriation branch of criminal misconduct. The 2018 amendment narrowed its …
Section 14 punishes a person who, after conviction for an offence under the Act, subsequently commits an offence punishable under it. The 2018 amendment recast the provis…
The amended explanation to Section 13 states that known sources of income means income received from a lawful source and intimated in accordance with applicable law, rule…
The 2018 amendment substantially narrowed criminal misconduct. The former Section 13(1)(d), often used for abuse of position and pecuniary advantage, was omitted. The pre…
The amended Section 12 punishes abetment of any offence under the Prevention of Corruption Act, whether or not the principal offence is committed in consequence. The 2018…
Section 11 addresses a conflict-laden benefit even where a specific corrupt official act is not proved. It applies when a public servant accepts, obtains, attempts to obt…
Section 9 creates liability for a commercial organisation where an associated person gives or promises an undue advantage to obtain or retain business or a business advan…
Section 7A, inserted in 2018, targets the influence market surrounding public administration. It applies where a person accepts, obtains, attempts to obtain, or agrees to…
The 2018 amendment made “undue advantage” the central currency of bribery offences. Section 2(d) defines it as gratification, in whatever form, other than legal remunerat…
The amended Section 7 replaces the older drafting centred on “gratification as a motive or reward” with an offence built around undue advantage and improper performance o…
The Prevention of Corruption (Amendment) Act, 2018, effective from 26 July 2018, did not merely increase penalties. It reorganised the liability structure of India’s prin…
Proof disputes in corruption prosecutions frequently begin with a simple but consequential question: what does recovery of money prove? The answer cannot be supplied by r…
CBI v. Thommandru Hannah Vijayalakshmi, 2021 SCC OnLine SC 923, clarified that a preliminary enquiry is not an inflexible precondition to every corruption FIR. Where info…
Section 17A, inserted in 2018, generally requires previous approval before enquiry, inquiry or investigation into an alleged PC Act offence relatable to a recommendation …
Section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act restricts a court from taking cognizance of specified offences alleged against a public servant without previous sanction f…
Trap operations are important anti-corruption tools, but recovery of treated currency is not by itself proof of every element under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corrupt…
A corruption prosecution does not automatically fail because the complainant dies, becomes unavailable or does not support the prosecution. The Constitution Bench in Neer…
Section 20 creates a statutory presumption when it is proved in a qualifying trial that a public servant accepted, obtained or attempted to obtain an undue advantage. The…